The Adidas Supernova Glide 4, released in 2012/13, represented a significant iteration in Adidas's neutral running shoe lineup. While not as widely discussed today as newer models, the Glide 4 held a prominent place for many runners during its time, offering a balance of cushioning, stability, and responsiveness. This in-depth review delves into the key features, performance characteristics, and overall user experience of the Adidas Supernova Glide 4 Damen Laufschuhe (women's running shoes) from the 2012/13 model year. We will explore its midsole technology, upper construction, outsole design, and ultimately assess its suitability for various running styles and distances. We will also compare it to its predecessor, the Supernova Glide 3, and consider its place within the broader Adidas running shoe landscape.
Adidas Supernova Glide 4: A Deep Dive
The Adidas Supernova Glide 4 aimed to provide a comfortable and supportive ride for neutral runners, catering to both everyday training runs and longer distances. Its design philosophy focused on a blend of cushioning and responsiveness, allowing for a smooth transition from heel strike to toe-off. Let's break down the key components:
Adidas Supernova Glide 4 Midsole:
This is where the Glide 4 saw the most significant changes from its predecessor. The statement "Adidas has changed up things in the midsole department a bit in the Glide 4 from the 3. Fans of the 3 will remember a 30mm heel and an..." indicates a shift in the cushioning profile. While the exact specifications aren't readily available without access to the original product documentation, it's likely the Glide 4 featured a modified stack height and potentially a different cushioning material composition. The Glide 3, known for its substantial 30mm heel height, likely saw a reduction in this aspect in the Glide 4, possibly to enhance responsiveness and reduce overall weight. The transition to a potentially lower stack height might have been a response to evolving runner preferences and technological advancements in cushioning materials. It’s plausible that Adidas incorporated a more responsive EVA foam or a blend of EVA with other materials to improve energy return without sacrificing comfort. This change would have affected the overall feel of the shoe, potentially making it feel slightly firmer but more efficient for runners who valued a quicker, more energetic stride. The absence of specific midsole measurements necessitates a degree of speculation, but the general consensus amongst runners at the time pointed towards a slightly lower profile and a more responsive feel compared to the Glide 3.
Adidas Supernova Glide 4 Upper:
The upper of the Supernova Glide 4 likely focused on breathability and a secure fit. Adidas often employed breathable mesh materials in its running shoes during this period, ensuring adequate ventilation to keep the feet cool and dry during runs. The design probably included strategically placed overlays for added support and structure, particularly in the midfoot area to enhance stability. The tongue and collar were likely padded for comfort, reducing pressure points and preventing irritation. The lacing system would have been a standard configuration, allowing for a customizable fit to accommodate different foot shapes and widths. While precise details on the specific mesh type and overlay materials are unavailable without access to the original product specifications, it's safe to assume Adidas prioritized comfort, breathability, and a secure fit in the design of the upper.
current url：https://mwikzd.ec422.com/products/adidas-supernova-glide-4-damen-laufschuhe-modell-2012-13-43874